- Home
- outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of
Background and purpose: Tantalum rod implantation has recently been proposed for treatment of early stages of femoral head osteonecrosis.The purpose of our study was to report the early results of its use in pre- and post-collapse stages of the disease. Methods: We studied prospectively 27 patients who underwent tantalum rod implantation for treatment of nontraumatic femoral head osteonecrosis
Background: Tantalum rods have been used in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) for several years, while Zimmer trabecular metal implants have been proposed as the best choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new porous tantalum rod on the treatment of early ONFH. Methods: From July 2014 to December 2015, 19 patients (21 hips) were treated with Runze tantalum rod
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new porous tantalum rod on the treatment of early ONFH. Methods: From July 2014 to December 2015, 19 patients (21 hips) were treated with Runze tantalum rod, and 20 patients (20 hips) received Zimmer tantalum prosthesis. All patients were followed up for at least 3 years.
Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years Sokratis E Varitimidis, Apostolos P Dimitroulias, Theophilos S Karachalios, Zoe H Dailiana, and Konstantinos N Malizos Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Thessalia, Larissa, Greece
Feb 01, 2009 Outcome after a new porous tantalum rod implantation for treatment of early-stage femoral head osteonecrosis. Huang W, Gong X, Sandiford S, He X, Li F, Li Y, Liu Z, Qin L, Yang J, Zhu S, Wang J, Tu X, Ye L, Hu N. Ann Transl Med, 7(18):441, 01 Sep 2019
Background and purpose Tantalum rod implantation has recently been proposed for treatment of early stages of femoral head osteonecrosis. The purpose of our study was to report the early results of its use in pre- and post-collapse stages of the disease. Methods We studied prospectively 27 patients who underwent tantalum rod implantation for treatment of nontraumatic femoral head osteonecrosis
Outcome after a new porous tantalum rod implantation for treatment of early-stage femoral head osteonecrosis Wei Huang 1,Xuan Gong 2,Steve Sandiford 1,3,Xiaoqiang He 1,4,Feilong Li 1,5,Yuwan Li 1,Ziming Liu 1,Leilei Qin 1,Jianye Yang 1,Sizheng Zhu 1,Jiawei Wang 1,Xiaolin Tu 6,Lei Ye 7,Ning Hu 1
Background and purpose Tantalum rod implantation has recently been proposed for treatment of early stages of femoral head osteonecrosis. The purpose of our study was to report the early results of its use in pre- and post-collapse stages of the disease. Methods We studied prospectively 27 patients who underwent tantalum rod implantation for treatment of nontraumatic femoral head osteonecrosis
Outcome after a new porous tantalum rod implantation for treatment of early-stage femoral head osteonecrosis Background: Tantalum rods have been used in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) for several years, while Zimmer trabecular metal
Jul 02, 2020 Outcome of tantalum rod insertion in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with minimum follow-up of 1 year: a meta-analysis and systematic review James Randolph Onggo, Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years
Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years.
Jan 30, 2010 This implies a survival rate of 44% after implantation of an osteonecrosis intervention rod after a mean follow-up of 1.45 years. The outcome after core decompression combined with the insertion of a tantalum osteonecrosis intervention implant did not show superior results compared to core decompression alone.
Aug 01, 2016 Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years. Acta Orthop 2009;80(1):20–25. 6.
Dec 12, 2020 Varitimidis SE, Dimitroulias AP, Karachalios TS, Dailiana ZH, Malizos KN. Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(1):20–5. Article Google Scholar 17. Davis ET, McKee MD, Waddell JP, Hupel T, Schemitsch EH.
Apr 21, 2020 Porous tantalum rod implantation is a novel surgical method that is used to treat avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head (hip). In the present study, the results of core decompression and tantalum rod implantation were compared with non‑surgical treatment for AVN, and the survivorship of the femoral head was evaluated. In total, 60 patients with AVN femoral head
Feb 23, 2015 Perhaps, this is the major reason for the better outcomes of treatment for end-stage ONFH with autologous bone marrow cells with porous tantalum rod implantation and vascularized iliac grafting compared to other vascularized bone graft procedures.
Mar 25, 2013 Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years. Acta Orthop. 2009 Feb;80(1):20-5. Free text link here .
Feb 23, 2015 Tantalum rod implantation with vascularized iliac grafting has been reported to be an effective method for the treatment of young patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) to avert the need for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there have been unsatisfactory success rates for end-stage ONFH. The authors describe a modified technique using bone marrow mesenchymal stem
Aug 24, 2016 To confirm 1) whether, compared with core decompression alone, core decompression with porous tantalum rod implantation improves the hip joint function of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery, 2) whether porous tantalum rod shows favorable biocompatibility with the human body, and 3) whether this treatment method is
Dec 16, 2019 Chronic inflammation and bone defects after total knee arthroplasty are a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. There have been few reports on
Jul 09, 2021 Titanium (Ti) is an ideal material choice for orthopaedic and dental implants, owing to its excellent biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, and mechanics. 1 Various surface modifications of Ti-based bone/dental implants have been suggested to enhance their integration with bone (osseointegration). 1 These enhancements in terms of physical, chemical, and biological modifications
Jul 11, 2019 Outcomes of conversion THA after failed porous tantalum implant for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a comparative matched study Show all authors. Jinhui Ma. Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years.
As a joint-preserving surgery, porous tantalum implantation (PTI) provides an additional treatment option for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, conversion to a total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed PTI is considered a challenging procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes and complications of THA after failed PTI with those of
Jan 30, 2010 This implies a survival rate of 44% after implantation of an osteonecrosis intervention rod after a mean follow-up of 1.45 years. The outcome after core decompression combined with the insertion of a tantalum osteonecrosis intervention implant did not show superior results compared to core decompression alone.
Jun 21, 2016 Another study 33 implied that the failure rate was 56.5% (13/23 ARCO stage I and II hips) after porous tantalum implantation after a mean follow-up of 1.45 years and their outcomes
This study evaluated the outcomes of using porous tantalum rods for the treatment of osteonecrosis ofthe femoral head (ONFH). We performed core decompression and inserted porous tantalum implants in 149 patients (168 consecutive hips) with ONFH. Hips had large (65), medium (64), or small (39) lesions; 63 lesions
Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:20-25. 24. Veillette CJ, Mehdian H, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Survivorship analysis and radiographic outcome following tantalum rod insertion for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint
Porous tantalum rod implantation is a novel surgical method that is used to treat avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head (hip). In the present study, the results of core decompression and tantalum rod implantation were compared with non-surgical treatment for AVN, and the survivorship of the femoral head was evaluated.
The technique of tantalum rod implantation combined with vascularized iliac grafting may be an effective joint-preserving method for the treatment of intermediate-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A larger group of patients that is compared with a control group is necessary to further research. Tantalum Rod Implantation and
Mar 25, 2013 Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years. Acta Orthop. 2009 Feb;80(1):20-5. Free text link here .
Background and purposeFemoral head necrosis (FHN) is a debilitating disease which seriously affects the patients’ quality of life, especially the young. The porous tantalum rod has the advantages of high volumetric porosity, low modulus of elasticity, and excellent osteoinduction, with exceptional biocompatibility and safety record in clinical application, which makes it an ideal choice for
Aug 24, 2016 To confirm 1) whether, compared with core decompression alone, core decompression with porous tantalum rod implantation improves the hip joint function of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery, 2) whether porous tantalum rod shows favorable biocompatibility with the human body, and 3) whether this treatment method is
Aug 16, 2018 Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with failure of tantalum rod implant for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) will be the only choice for patients. However,it remains unknown whether tantalum rod implantation has an adverse effect on the survival time of implants following conversion to THA. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of
Jan 14, 2020 The survival rate after the implantation of an osteonecrosis intervention rod after a mean follow-up of 529 days was only 44%, and the outcome after core decompression combined with the insertion of a tantalum osteonecrosis intervention implant did not show superior results compared with core decompression alone.
Jan 30, 2010 This implies a survival rate of 44% after implantation of an osteonecrosis intervention rod after a mean follow-up of 1.45 years. The outcome after core decompression combined with the insertion of a tantalum osteonecrosis intervention implant did not show superior results compared to core decompression alone. This is in contrast to existing